Showing posts with label william boylan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label william boylan. Show all posts

Sunday, November 22, 2015

We're Back! Announcing Our New Editor-in-Chief

We're back! 1,400 blog posts, 3,020 uncensored, published comments, and over 555,000 page views in under 4 years, via word of mouth advertising.

We are proud to announce we have decided to name William Boylan as Editor-in-Chief and the voice of the Middletown Insider!

As the editor of The Middletown Insider, Bill’s philosophy is, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. Naturally, there will eventually be some changes, but nothing drastic is anticipated. While primarily a voice in the wilderness for conservative views, conflicting points of view will not be censored, off hand. The Insider still encourages reader participation through comments, letters to the editor, newsletters, slices of life, photos, etc. addressed to Mr. Boylan at middletowninsider@gmail.com .

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Letter to the Editor: Be Apart of the Solution for Middletown

Below is a letter to the editor from resident William Boylan. Our apologies for not publishing this before the Middletown Republican Town Committee meeting held earlier this week. The platform below is not the official platform of the Town Committee, but one proposed by member William Boylan for consideration. We publish letters to the editor as a courtesy for readers and views are that of the author of such letter; those views may or may not reflect those of the Insider staff. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fellow Republicans, Conservatives and Libertarians:

Let us not forget that the Middletown Republican Town Committee caucuses on Thursday. We meet at the Middletown Police Department, in the Community Room at 7:00. There are many seats still open on the committee and even thought you may not have submitted a letter of intent, it is still possible to be nominated from the floor. PLEASE come and join us and be a part of the solution! YOU are needed and everyone can contribute in some small way. Never think that your voice and small contribution do not matter, because they most certainly do. It is going to be a long, hard slog, but many hands make for light work. Come down and be a part of the process!

In document below, I present to you a proposal for adoption and incorporation into the MRTC Party Platform. Please take a couple of minutes to review it. Should the humble honor of serving on the committee be laid upon me at the caucus, I intend to bring this up for debate, discussion and implementation. Your input and participation are appreciated

Your never to be humble servant, Bill Boylan

P.S. Leave your guns in the car! ;)  LOL!

Proposed Platform for MRTC
  1. To have a continuously active Committee, whose members are dedicated to the betterment of city government and to the principals of a smaller, less intrusive government.
  2. To be involved all in local, state and national elections taking place in the several districts wherein Middletown lies.
  3. The 2013 Party Platform for city government calls for long range planning. The MRTC should adopt such a policy, continuously looking forward 20 or more years.
  4. Members are an under utilized asset. With 60 members, there is the potential to have 12, five-man committees dedicated to as many areas of activity.
  5. Membership on the RTC is not a cocktail and limousine honorarium; it is a sacred trust, requiring personal sacrifice, dedication and commitment.
  6. Participation must be required of every member of the RTC. Anyone unable or unwilling to be an active member of the Committee should resign to allow for others to step in and go to work, or be replaced at the next election.
  7. There is a need for organization, planning, vision and strong leaders in many areas. This need can be fulfilled by delegating responsibilities to committees. Each committee would have a chair, affording people the opportunity to demonstrate their abilities. Those who rise and shine could be groomed as future candidates.
  8. Forming committees would require much discussion and debate about the necessity, scope and purpose of each. Such committees may include:

a) Media Outreach Committee – To effectively take advantage of available resources including print, TV, radio, internet and social media. Also responsible for press releases. (Bill Wilson for Chair)
b) Youth Outreach and Recruitment Committee – The future of the community, the party, state and nation depend on our youth.
c) Communications Committee – Primarily responsible for maintaining a database of contact info on Committee members, candidates and volunteers, distributing that contact info to the members, as needed, particularly at election time. Also responsible for devising a plan to contact members, (email blast), with updates on RTC activity and matters of urgency.
d) Legislative Update Committee – Responsible for keeping members apprised of legislative activities at all levels of government.
e) Candidate Recruitment Committee – To seek out and recruit the best possible candidates.
f) Training Committee – Manning the phone banks at election time is essentially telemarketing.Some sort of training of volunteers would serve to make the phone bank more effective.
g) Technology Committee – To manage, improve and oversee the MRTC web site and social media pages. (note: We should establish a presence on the Tea Party Connection social media site.)
h) Opposition Study and Counter Offensive Committee – To observe and report the strategery of the MDTC. Apparently, the Democrat strategy is working. They control the state, as well the town.They are doing something right and we need to know what it is. We need to consider adapting successful tactics and countering disinformation. Look at the MDTC home page,http://www.dems.info/middletown/index.htm . You will see a list of 22 “accomplishments” in the last two years. One of which is “Closed $8million dollar budget deficit in 2011-2012 budget.” The bios lower on the page, talk of “accountability” and “keeping taxes low”. These false claims of success need to be countered.
i) School Curriculum Oversight Committee – To monitor what children are taught in school and assure they are not being indoctrinated into believing America is “bad” and government is the solution to all problems.
j) Minority Outreach and Recruitment Committee - WE are the party of inclusion and civil liberties.The conspicuous shortage of minorities caucusing with Republicans should be of concern.
k) Jury Rights and Powers Education Committee – To inform people of the jury’s
power to judge the validity of the law, as well as the application of the law, in addition to determining guilt or innocence.
l) A committee to work with the RTCs of our neighboring towns for the purpose of sharing ideas, tactics and strategeries, to work together for the common goal of electing conservativeRepublicans and restoring the republic.

Monday, July 08, 2013

Open to the General Assembly: Is this the "change" you had "hoped" for?

Open letter to the General Assembly

Dear members of the General Assembly,

Well, it's happened again. No, you haven't wasted a perfectly good hour listening to Car Talk, another retiree, a client of mine, is moving out of state. Before I left for a short vacation, I talked to her about a new deck; a nine thousand dollar deck.

Not only is the state losing tax revenue, but every business these people would have patronized is losing money, too. The money from that job alone, would have paid my basic expenses for a month!

Now, she tells me they have decided to sell the house and move because, "I just cannot see us being able to retire in any kind of comfort here."

This is the result of over burdensome taxes and regulations. Companies like PTR are taking their businesses and JOBS elsewhere and retirees like my client are taking their pensions and leaving the state in droves. This is a direct result of policies coming out of Hartford.

Is this the "change" you had "hoped" for?

Bill Boylan, Middletown

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Letter to the Editor: Open Letter to Sen. Bartolomeo : Mandatory Mental Health Evaluations for Children Unlawful

Below is a essay by  citizen author author William Boylan. All opinions expressed are that of the author and not necessarily that of the Insider staff. Proposed Connecticut  Bill SB374 if passed by would mandate behavior assessments of all  children whether enrolled in public schools or not. Senator of the 13th District with includes parts of Middletown, Middlefield, and Meriden has been a strong supporter of this type of screening for children, likening it to in her words "diabetics and insulin."Former Congressional candidate Wayne Winsley wrote about the consequences of this in his article A Check up from the Neck up.  

--------------------------------------------------
Dear Sen. Bartolomeo,

In your press release of Feb. 13 regarding school safety, you say, "Students should be able to receive mental health evaluations/treatment, and districts need some recourse if parents and students refuse to participate."

The last part of the sentence contradicts the first part. The first part says, students "should be able to receive mental health evaluations," implying a choice. The second part says, "districts need . . . recourse if parents and students refuse. . .  That changes the first part, "should be able receive evaluations", to "must receive evaluations." It makes them mandatory and implies sanctions against anyone who refuses.

This is a dangerous precedent.  It forces something on parents and students that they may not want or need for whatever reason which is no one else's business without probable cause, reasonable suspicion or judicial review.  It places the state above the parents and usurps the parent's rights, responsibilities and authority.

Nowhere in the CT or federal Constitutions does the state have the authority to order mandatory psychological evaluations.  No, not even the "General Welfare" clause.

It is blatantly in violation of an individuals right to be free from unwarranted searches and violates the individuals rights to privacy.  Children are persons under the Constitution and are afforded equal protection rights, too.

The best and most efficient way to save lives under such circumstances as that in Newtown is to have armed guards in the schools and eliminate so called "gun free" zones.  The only ones in them, free of guns, are the victims and it is proven that such mass murderers as Lanza deliberately seek out "gun free" zones because they know they can act there with impunity.  It is foolish to require pistol permitted parents to disarm themselves before entering a school.
Allowing teachers and staff the opportunity to volunteer to receive training and carry a firearm, (with perhaps a small stipend), would work to protect students because the evil and mentally deranged would know they would be met with a resolved spirit of resistance.
Permit qualified volunteers to receive the same training as teachers and patrol the schools, acting as "resource" personnel.  By qualified I mean retired military and police veterans and others.  The idea that children would be "frightened" by having armed guards around is absurd! 
These volunteer would be members of the community and known as the grandparents, uncles, aunts and neighbors of the students.  Trust me, what grandchild would not be quite happy and proud to know her grandfather was keeping her and her classmates safe at school.
As far as the current "gun control" proposals go, I have yet to see anything that even closely resembles "common sense".  For "Common Sense", I suggest reading Thomas Payne.  I also urge you to re-read some of my past emails to you on the subject and listen to the testimony I delivered before the Gun Violence Task Force, in January.

No government can be all thing to all people at all times.  Nor should it try to be.  A government that governs best, governs least.  And that is as it should be.

Very truly yours,
Bill Boylan, Middletown

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Guest Blog: Changing Neighborhoods, an Essay

Below is a essay by Middletown resident William Boylan. All opinions expressed are that of the author and not necessarily that of the Insider staff.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changing Neighborhoods, an Essay. By William Boylan


Alex Haley;s book, “A Different Kind of Christmas”, was given to me as suggested reading; something lighter than the usual reading fare to distract from the enormous problems our society faces at a turbulent time, in a turbulent world.


On page three, a phrase caught my eye and stuck in my mind as relevant,

“. . . changing neighborhoods is not always a solution to problems.”
You see, for the longest time the idea of fleeing my adopted state of Connecticut has lingered in the back of my mind.  Preventing it were finances, something not insurmountable but problematic and that Linda’s parents were still here and that she would never be able to leave them.  (can’t fault her for that)  Though I have some close friends, my family here is estranged, therefore I have no heavy anchor and so what other reason is there to remain?


Prodding me to leave is frustration and dismay over the political climate and the steady erosion of liberties by a legislature that ignores the Constitution.  Rampant taxation and debt, a populous willing to sacrifice liberty for a false sense of security, social and ethical decline, a shrinking income and an ever increasing cost of living are major contributors to my desire for a change of scenery.

Not being one to run from adversity though, something about the idea of fleeing just doesn’t rest well in my gut.
In junior high I was bullied until I got fed up one day and fought back . . . and won.  I was never picked on, again.  In fact, I earned a measure of respect from fellow classmates.

In high school, someone stole a watch my parents gave me for Christmas.  At 17, I filed a suit in small claims court . . . and won.

As an adult, I battled several unscrupulous landlords . . . and won.

Once, a prosecutor who didn’t like my attitude, brought me up on non-support charges, even though I was current and making regular payments to my ex.  She did this without standing.  My ex never filed a complaint for non-support, nor did the prosecutor ever talk to her about it.  I fought back . . . and won.  (I believe it cost the prosecutor her job.)

It just ain’t in me Irish blood to back down from a fight!

But, the fight we face today is not about me.  It goes far beyond my narrow, personal interest.  What we face today, is a battle for the future of our state and nation, and indeed the world.  If Liberty falls in America, the world will fall into the abyss with her.  We are certainly the last bastion of hope (outside Christ) for the world.  If Connecticut falls, so surely will another state fall, then another.  Before long, there may be nowhere left to run!  What of our children, grand children and generations yet unborn?  Our posterity has a stake in this, too.  What will be the legacy we leave unto them; liberty or tyranny?

What of the oath we took and renew each week at the Connecticut Restoration Coalition meetings; the oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic; the pledge of our lives, our fortunes, our sacred honor, so help us God?  Do we fulfill that oath by fleeing?  Do we truly mean what we say or are our words hollow platitudes?

Maybe I think too much, but what of the Founders, the original American Patriots?  What of them?  What of their sacrifices?  What of their pledge of their fortunes, their lives, and their sacred honor?  They truly meant it and lived it.  Many lost everything they had; money, property, family, life.  What would they think of us if they could look down and see what we are doing, today?  Do we honor their sacrifices by running or do we follow in their footsteps and live as we speak?  Or, are we simply paying lip service to a romantic notion?

Our mettle is about to be tested; do we pass the test, or do we fail?

“. . . changing neighborhoods is not always a solution to problems.”

Bill Boylan, HSD (high school dropout)
AKA, Murphy’s Bain

Some of Connecticut’s Patriots, courtesy of the Connecticut Society of the Sons of the American Revolution, http://www.connecticutsar.org/patriots/

Patriot List

Isaiah Adkins - served the Connecticut Line for 6 years
Rev. Ebenezer Baldwin - a patriotic preacher.
John Barker, M.D. - citizen, patriot, doctor
Israel Bissel - alerted colonists of the British attack at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775.
General Henry Champion - a brave and efficient officer
Col. William Douglas - colonel of New Haven Regiment.
Oliver Ellsworth - Jurist, Statesman and Naturalist
Capt. John Gilbert - killed during the Battle of New Haven
Daniel Griswold - one of Knowlton's Rangers.
Capt. Nathan Hale - the man with only one regret.
Capt. Nathan Hale - 2nd version
Capt. Nathan Hale - 3rd version
Capt. Nathan Hale - scholarly report on Nathan Hale
Cmdr. David Hawley - whaleboat warfare on the sound.
CLICK TO CONTINUE LIST

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

2 Important Meetings: Big Dan Comes to Town!

1. Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and Lt. Gov. Nancy Wyman will host a community forum in Middletown on Wednesday, March 6.Wednesday’s forum in Middletown will be held at City Hall, 245 deKoven Drive, and will run from 7 to 8 p.m. Staged questions by Malloy lackeys & pre-screened questions will be allowed by sign-in sheet.

Those wishing to do business at City Hall Thursday morning should not the late opening, as Mayor Dan Drew will be arriving later than usual. 
The citizen's understanding is called upon, for our dear Mayor's lips will be quite sore from all the butt kissing on Wednesday. 

 Mayor Drew will resume his usual schedule of leaving early at 2:30 pm to watch his children, and have the mayor mobile returned by Mayoral aide Joe Samolis to give the appearance he actually works a full day.

Tell us in comments: What would you ask Gov. Malloy?

2. The state General Assembly’s Public Health Committee will hold a public hearing in Middletown this Friday. 11 a.m. at Beckham Hall, 45 Wyllys Ave., at Wesleyan University.
The Public Health Committee is co-chaired by state Sen. Terry B. Gerratana, D-6, and state Rep. Susan M. Johnson, R-49. State Sen. Jason Welch, R-31, and state Rep. Prasad Srinivasan, R-31.

The Agenda states the committee will review bills pertaining to approval for residential nursing facilities; requirements that psychiatrists give notice that patients pose a threat to themselves or others; behavioral health assessments for children; mental health services at school-based centers; and other topics pertaining to psychiatric and physical health.

Resident William Boylan discusses the dangers of school mandated psych evaluations in an open letter to Sen. Bartolomeo published here on Patch:
http://middletown-ct.patch.com/blog_posts/open-letter-to-senator-barotolomeo

Letter to the Editor: The Shaw Resolution Right for Middletown

Letter to the Editor by William Boylan:
Middletown should adopt the Shaw Resolution. 

3/5/2013 Editors' Note: The resolution below was forwarded to the Insider from reader William Boylan,  original author is Alan Shaw. Our apologies for the confusion. Thank you Mr. Boylan and Palin Smith for submission. 
THE SHAW RESOLUTION by Alan Shaw

Whereas the Declaration of Independence, issued in 1776, speaks of certain unalienable rights which are endowed on men by their creator,

And whereas the Declaration of Independence was in direct response to the abuses of the British government towards the colonies and the colonists of North America, including the 1774 ban on the importation of firearms and gunpowder and the 1775 violent confiscations of firearms and gunpowder,

And Whereas the United States Constitution contains a section comprising the first tem amendments, commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights,

And whereas the second of those amendments states in part that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,

And Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States in the 1876 case of U.S. v. Cruikshank recognized the rights mentioned in the first and second amendments were not granted by the Constitution but existed prior to the Constitution,

And whereas the Supreme Court of the United States in both the 2008 case of District of Columbia v. Heller and the 2010 case of McDonald vs. Chicago that the second amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes such as self defense,

And whereas recent events in our state have caused many elected officials on national, state and local levels to find it politically expedient to speak out against the unalienable rights of free citizens in the name of political correctness, including seeking to pass legislation which would infringe upon those rights,

Be it resolved that the Stamford Republican Town Committee recognizes and supports the right of the people to keep and bear arms as protected by the second amendment of the United States Constitution.

Be it further resolved that the Stamford Republican Town Committee recognizes that elected officials must represent all citizens but find that we cannot support those politicians even from our own political party, who criticize, or seek to infringe upon or otherwise control the rights of the people they were elected to serve.

Popular Posts