"The term 'false flag' has its origins in naval warfare
where the use of a flag other than the belligerent's true battle flag
is flown while engaging the enemy to provide a tactical advantage."
In order for our President to
make responsible decisions regarding foreign policy and the use of
military force, our intelligence community bears an awesome
responsibility to provide him with accurate information. When that
information is tampered with or concocted to fit a political narrative,
the President's actions can appear to be quite reasonable, even though
in reality he will have been manipulated for ulterior and possibly
On April 4, 2017 a bomb was
dropped in Idlib Syria. The position of the United States is that
Bashar al-Assad used a sarin gas device against his own people. The
position of the Syrian government is that a regular munition was
dropped on a suspected Al Nusra Front (Al Qaeda) warehouse containing
chemical munitions. In my previous article titled "Has President Trump Been Blackmailed or Deceived by the NEOCONs?"
I discussed the various motives (or lack thereof) for either
argument. In this article I will discuss the apparent misleading of
both the American public and possibly even the President of the United
States by our intelligence community.
The following are the items
of evidence presented by the U.S. intelligence community to support the
decision for the President's deadly attack on an airbase in Syria with
59 Tomahawk Cruise Missiles:
Careful review of these
images reveals very quickly that the North/South orientation is
reversed and the magnification scale is dramatically different between
the two images. When the images are normalized for orientation and
scale, it becomes rather obvious that the Pentagon claim is false and
that the impact site they insist is "new" was in fact present before
the event in question:
Step 1 - Orient transparent "No impact crater" image at correct size over "New impact crater" image.
In Step 1 above, we can
clearly see that the "No impact crater" marker has been placed too far
north to provide an accurate comparison. By using a fixed distance
reference available in both images that is the length of the
misplacement (the length of the arms of the U shaped building), we can
accurately place the "No impact crater (2)" marker in Step 2 below:
To read more, or make a comment on this post,
Step 2 - Correctly position the "No impact crater (2)" marker to determine if a crater pre-existed.
As is clearly evident in the Step 2 image above, the "New impact
crater" actually existed before the bomb event, thereby eliminating the
theory and analysis presented by the Pentagon.
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.