is a essay by Middletown Republican Town Committee chair, resident, and
veteran Ken McClellan. All opinions expressed are that of the author
and not necessarily that of the Insider staff.
The Mayor’s Task Force on Efficiency in Government.
May 2, at a hastily called Common Council meeting, the Common Council
voted 10-2 to merge the Personnel and City Attorney departments, with
the HR Director reporting to the city attorney. There was not much
publicity for the meeting, and attendance was sparse. The meeting was
called in order to allow a second vote on the ordinance change, as
required by the city charter, within 90 days of the first vote. The
initial vote was taken on Feb 4. The issue was removed from the April
meeting agenda without explanation.
This was the first, and so far, the only recommendation implemented, out of 15 recommendations submitted by the task force.
defending and justifying this recommendation, the Mayor and the city
attorney, Mr. Brig Smith, in various meetings, gave a number of
justifications for eliminating the personnel department, and placing
that responsibility with the City Attorney. Taken at face value these
justifications make sense. However, when examined, the justifications
are not valid.
Reason 1: Numerous municipalities and companies operate under this model.
Mr. Smith and the Mayor stated during the Finance and Government committee that
Lansing Michigan, and ‘numerous municipalities in Wisconsin’, and a
number or ‘major corporations’ that operate under this model. Mr.
Smith repeated this assertion at the special meeting on May 2. Since Mr
Smith is from Lansing, I would presume that he would have accurate
information about that city.
what I found. In Lansing, MI, HR and Legal are separate departments.
When questioned about the discrepancy between his statement at the
Finance and government committee, and my finding, Mr Smith caveated his
earlier statement, saying that the city attorney was also the personnel
director of another agency. I guess he misspoke at the Finance and
Regarding Wisconsin, I checked the larger towns and cities, where there should be a Personnel staff.
Eau Claire has separate HR and Attorney offices under Administration.
Racine, Wausau, Green Bay, Milwaukee, La Crosse, Madison, Wautoma, Onalaska, Fon du Lac all have separate offices.
Marion: looks like the city clerk handles job applications, and Marion
doesn’t have a city attorney. In Grand Rapids, there is an
Administrative Department with both HR and Legal as separate offices.
That’s 2 cities with an Administrative Department, with HR and Legal as
separate offices. I’ll get back to that later.
a further check I looked at Michigan. Detroit and a number of other
cities and towns of various sizes that I checked, all have separate
Personnel/HR and Legal departments.
checked a number of cities and towns in Connecticut, starting with
cities with a population of around 40,000, like Middletown. Among them:
East Hartford, Milford, Stratford, Wallingford, Southington, Shelton,
Groton and Norwich. I checked Meriden, Glastonbury, Rocky Hill,
Waterbury, Torrington, West Hartford, Greenwich, Bristol. All of those
cities and towns have separate HR and Legal.
also checked a number of businesses, major corporations and small
business in Connecticut and other states. I could not find any that
have the Personnel Manager reporting to the corporation counsel. If
this is as wide-spread a practice, I should have found one. There may be
companies where the Director of Personnel is an attorney, but that
would not be the same as merging the HR and Legal Departments.
example cited where the Personnel Department was supervised by the
Legal Counsel was Southern Connecticut State University. I wrote to the
Personnel Director, Jaye Bailey. Here’s her response: “..I
serve as the VP for Human Resources and Labor Relations. I don’t serve
as the GC because only the Office of the Attorney General can act as
the University’s counsel. I report to the President. ”.
what was the point of all this research? At first, I did not believe
that anyone operated with this model, but I wanted to try to find
examples where it was used. I found one. In the interest of accuracy, I
did locate one city that has the Personnel Manager reporting to the
City Attorney: Stamford. Funny, that’s where Governor Dannell Malloy
is from. I found none in business. If anyone can give me the name of a
business that uses this model, I would welcome the information. I will
confirm that information with that business. The conclusion is that
the Mayor and Mr. Smith provided inaccurate, misleading information to
the study committee and the Common Council when they stated that in
‘numerous companies and municipalities’ the City Attorney manages
Personnel. If Mr. Smith and Mayor Drew could provide specific, named
examples where the Personnel/HR Department report to and is managed by
the Legal Department, other than Stamford, I would like to see the list,
and I will happily and publicly acknowledge any correction. But, one
city, out of the several dozen that I randomly checked, and not one
business out of several dozen checked, does not make this a widespread
practice. Again: Is Mayor Drew misinformed, or lying?
Reason 2: Reduce the number of directors reporting to the Mayor
This reduces the total of 21 to 20. I won’t comment on that, here, but I’ll get back to it later.
Reason 3: Efficiency gained by co-locating the City Attorney and HR.
This could be done by a simple relocation of one office or the other.
Reason 4: Personnel is governed by laws and requires supervision by an attorney.
concerns are not the extent of the Personnel department. They do
screening, hiring, training, promotions, performance evaluations. Water
and Sewer, Public Works, the Fire and Police Departments, the Common
Council and Mayor are all governed by laws, so by the same logic, the
Police Department, Fire Department, Council and Mayor should also be
reporting to the Legal Department. Sounds a little ridiculous, doesn’t
were the stated justifications for this merger. If all of them are
inaccurate, specious or ridiculous, what is the real reason for the
merger? Is there another reason that is not being made public?
Reason not to merge
is, however, one very good reason not to place the Personnel Department
under the City Attorney. The City Attorney needs to be an advisor to
and resource for all city departments. The city attorney represents the
city in legal matters. He or she should not be directly involved or
managing routine operations of any department. Department directors
should certainly seek his advice as needed.
is responsible for recruiting, vetting, hiring, training and developing
employees. The Director of HR must at times hear work grievances,
which could result in legal action against the city. Would the Director
of HR be a neutral hearing officer if reporting to the city attorney? I
don’t believe that is possible.
There are 15 recommendations in the task force report.
Here are a few, in the order they were presented in the report:
Establish a Technology Advisory Committee
Institute performance appraisals with specific, measurable goals
Supervisory and Management Skills Training
Review City Personnel Rules
Enforce Internal Controls and Checks and Balances
Merge Information Systems and Tax Assessor into the Finance Department
Reorganize the Finance Department and add a Grant Writer
Merge Legal, Personnel and Human Resources
Merge Arts and Culture Office and Building Division into Planning, Conservation
Merge Senior Services into the Recreation Department
is the order in which the recommendations were presented by the task
force. Merging the HR and Legal departments was Number 12 of 15 on the
list. Why did the mayor start with eliminating the personnel
What is the status of the other 14 recommendations? Will any be implemented?
the meeting on May 2, Council members hinted that my opposition to this
merger was political. It is not. I agree with a number of
recommendations of the task force, and look forward to the mayor and
council implementing those recommendations, including the Management
Training, Performance Standards and Evaluations and enforcing Internal
Controls. And I look forward to the improved service that will be
provided to the citizens of Middletown by a more efficient,
well-trained, well-led staff.
a final comment. The Mayor’s task force was directed to reduce the
number of directors reporting to the Mayor. They went from 21 to 13. I
have a recommendation reduce that number to 4 Directors reporting to
the Mayor, each with 4 – 7 Assistant Directors reporting to each
Director. The model I propose has been used by the US Military quite
successfully, and is used in the majority of businesses across the
country. Group city departments and offices by functions.
4 Departments: Administration, Safety, Public Works, and Services.
Take the current 21 Directors and group them as follows:
Human Relations, Information Systems, Legal Department, Personnel
Department, Tax Assessor Office, Town Clerk Office. Include Finance and
the City Treasurer in this department.
Safety: Emergency Management, Fire Department, Health Department, Police Department. Include Communications.
Planning, Conservation and Development, Public Works Department, Water
and Sewer Department, Parking Department. Include vehicle, building and
grounds maintenance and custodial services in this department. Include
such portions of Parks and Recreation that do maintenance and
Russell Library, Senior Services Department. Include such portions of
Parks and Recreation as Youth and Sports programs and Arts & Culture
1. Reduces the number of directors from 21 to 4, saving money on salary, and reducing the number of direct reports to the mayor.
2. Balances the number of direct reports to each director.
3. Improves communication and coordination by grouping like functions.
all vehicle maintenance under one supervisor, and consolidates
purchasing of parts and supplies, maintenance management and supervision
all building maintenance and custodial services under one supervisor,
and consolidates purchasing of parts and supplies, maintenance
management and supervision of repairs.. This could be expanded to
include building currently managed by the board of education.
6. Places all grounds-keeping/landscaping work under one supervisor, which should improve also resource usage and scheduling.
proposal above is just that, a proposal, not a plan. But I do have
examples of this model being used successfully, and think that it is
worth looking into.
Thank you for your attention,
Chairman, Middletown Republican Town Committee
Well said Ken! Wow caught the city attorney in lies!! Gee wonder which former Dem councilwoman will be the 3rd city attorney? Shameless how the cost savings were sold to the public! Those who voted for this ought to be ashamed too. Keep up the good work guys!ReplyDelete
Very enlightening. It is disturbing that the mayor is so arrogant that he continues to lie bald face to the public (remember "100% of the streets are plowed"?)and thinks that it is okay? Disrespectful.ReplyDelete
The one thing that bothers me is that Ken's wife sits on the BOE and she didn't open her mouth when the decision was made to have the city attorney handle BOE matters as a cost saving measure. She should have asked to see the breakdown of past costs and detailed cost projections and where the proposal was going to save money. Instead she rubber stamped it. So far it hasn't panned out either operationally or monetarily. Ken needs to tend to his own back yard as well.
Again, the republicans are a day late and a dollar short on their finding! Why doesn't this info come out before, so the public can see this BS? He is right! But what good does it do now. Vote this mayor out now before it gets worse! Oh wait....I got no one to vote for !ReplyDelete
So is Ed4Ed McKeon really gonna primary Drew for mayor?ReplyDelete
Where have you been? This blog posted numerous articles about how bad this was that the Press and Eye censored! Wake up! Kleckowski and Salafia have been speaking out about this from the get -goReplyDelete
For Anonymous, asking me to 'tend my own yard'. If you're trying to imply that I should instruct my wife in how she should perform her duties as an elected official, keep dreaming. Not going to happen.ReplyDelete
For Anonymous telling me I'm a day late and a dollar short: I spoke in opposition to this at the February Common Council Meeting, at the January Finance and Governance meeting and published an opinion piece on the subject here in the Middletown Insider on Feb 5, a day after the February Common Council meeting.
The Democrats in this City and pretty much on a National level, do and say what they want. Decades of give aways have secured them the votes. This is proven in EVERY vote in the Council, and in the past Presidential election.ReplyDelete
Deb and Linda need real republican support, not dem at heart Phil and Joe . They gotta go!ReplyDelete
I agree with many of Ken's comments but not with all of them involving consolidation of departments. As one commenter stated, this article would have been put to good use if it came out sooner. The major problem I see is that as Republic Chairman, Ken's two Councilmen voted for the reorg with the eight Dems. Either Ken's information was not discussed within the Party, or the Councilmen didn't believe him, but believed the Mayor's information as truthful.. As a point of information, I am an Unaffiliated voter. I now see why the Republican Party in Middletown does not have many elected Mayor's and majority Council's - - - it seems they are disfunctional and have settled to be second and take any crumbs the Democrats offer them.ReplyDelete
How about changing the article title to OUTRAGE to department merger. Dan's new title should be "Dan the disappointment!" I can't believe this kid is Mayor of this city. Disgusted. I'm sure we will be attempting to fix this mess when he eventually leaves office. I hope!ReplyDelete
Bipartisanship is wonderful when it is a two way street. We had six years of fighting between the republican mayor and the democratic council. Now we have democrats across the board and along with two republicans that have taken it upon themselves to be bipartisan, but in the process have forsaken the party principles in voting for a democratic budget that raised taxes. Working together is a wonderful thing unless only one side compromising.ReplyDelete
My question will the two republicans vote for raising taxes once again. If so will you step down from the republican party to become the democrats they surely are.
If Dan had supervised Milardo when she was Personnel Director, this wouldn't have been necessary.ReplyDelete
Now it gives him an excuse when one of Tommy's boys gets a nepotism job, he can blame it on the poor supervision of the city attorney instead of himself. He's dumb enough to think the public won't see his fingers all over it. Remember this is the same guy who told the public that the streets were 100% plowed when everyone was posting pictures of their unplowed streets. Lies are a way of life with Pinocchio Drew.
To claim Salafia and Kleckowski are not bi partisan is offensive Drew refuses to put them on committees because they can actually think and question things on behalf of taxpayers. During the snow storm both inquired about conditions and were told everything is fine. Low and behold trucks are down and the guard was turned away. Drew only will work with the republicans he knows won't question the status quo. Look at his committee appointments! It's token the same two R's all the way. The GOP party needs to wake up nd cut those working against them out of the picture, then organize organize organize!ReplyDelete
Who says there is a savings? You had one attorney with a secretary - maybe $175,000. Then a personnel director, assistant and one secretary - maybe $225,000 - total $400,000. Now you have one GENERAL COUNCIL $135,000, two assistant general councils $250,000 a paralegal and secretary $100,000, a personnel director and secretary $135,000 - Total $620,000. This "new way" is costing the tax payers $220,000. Another Dan Drew LIE! If I say it so many times, maybe they will be stupid enough to believe me!ReplyDelete
I thought we weren't suing anyone anymore - what do we need three attorney's for?
Anonymous 10:32am is an idiot! The comment about supervision of the Personnel Director is moronic!ReplyDelete
Every Mayor, including micro-manager Drew directs and oversees the Personnel Director. Every decision and move that position ever made was set in motion and approved by each Mayor, including Drew.
As for the comments of Anonymous 11:23am, you are correct, but missed one thing - the Dems and Mayor are afraid of intelligent women, and either ignore them, or attack them, to "put them in their place."
Middletown Republicans are spending all their time nibbling around the edges and grasping at straws with manufactured issues-- blaming the mayor for a snowstorm; criticizing him for having the gall to leave his office or god forbid travel outside the city; making shoddily researched blog posts about his effort to reorganize a city government full of deadwood and inefficiency-- yet they refuse to put forward a candidate for mayor. No one is running, for fear they'll be demolished like Deb and Callie were last year. Meanwhile they'll go on posting self-congratulatory BS in this online echo chamber, thinking that they are brave truth tellers when in fact they just don't know what they are talking about.ReplyDelete
"You gonna bark all day, little doggie, or are you gonna bite?"
Not one post on this blog blamed Prince Drew for the storm. want fluff? read the mess or other blog. I read this blog or truth. And truth is the Democrats are quite scared the Ponzi scheme is falling apart. Don't take the bait and keep up the good work!ReplyDelete
7:28- congratulations, you didn't literally blame the Democrat for a weather occurrence. You know what I meant (well, actually, I guess I shouldn't be making assumptions on that count). Fact remains- the local GOP has been reduced to shouting into cyberspace. Case in point: "Ponzi scheme"?? Conspiracy theories are just gonna mean more electoral defeats. That is, if y'all even manage to dredge up a candidate.ReplyDelete
There are many bitter truths in the comments written here. No one is more angry and frustrated with Phil Pessina's narcissistic behavior than this Middletown Republican. Phil's only concern is with getting himself reelected and is only bringing Joe Bibisi along for the ride to provide cover and support for himself. Wonder if Joe even realizes he sits alone on Phil's Island?ReplyDelete
Bipartisan means both sides working together to find common ground on an issue/issues. Isn't doesn't mean one side coming up with an plan and telling the other side that they have to agree to such plan without any compromising by the original side. That is caving in, not compromising.ReplyDelete
I want one person to tell me how combining the legal department with personal makes sense.
What is up with the water and sewer department bills coming in the mail on the 4th, and the due date being the 1st! Im disgusted to see the enclosed envelope say city of middletown, c/o BOSTON MA. WTF. Does this city do anything right anymore? All this change and all I see is more incompetence, ignorance and stubbornness. This was never the way in the past! Is this because of this egomaniac mayor who thinks he knows everything about life at 32? Wake up middletown. Seb may have had issues but this crack-pot knows jack $h1&! Who's too blame for this kids raise to fame and Middletowns fall from grace? The Serra's ?ReplyDelete
Wandering off-topic folks.ReplyDelete
HR working for the Lawyers - Yes or no. If you support it, why?