According to CTMirror, Lawlor’s target was “Susan Hatfield, a state prosecutor from eastern Connecticut who was a Donald J. Trump delegate in 2016 and once worked in Washington as a young policy aide to former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich…” Hatfield, a Republican, is running for the Attorney General spot soon to be vacated by George Jepsen.
For any number of reasons, this was not the brightest tweet in Lawlor’s constellation of tweets. Imputing racism to all Trump delegates smacks of McCarthyism, and Hatfield is a woman who should be able to toss her hat into a political ring without being peppered by politicians operating in the #me-too era who ought to be conscious of possible offenses against women entering the political theatre.
Lawlor instantly was denounced by State Sen. Heather Somers of Groton, who called him “a hypocrite for saying he supports more women running for state office and then attacking a female candidate on social media.” Somers called upon Lawlor to issue a formal apology. One imagines Lawlor yawning at the prospect of an apology before conferring on yet another violent convicted criminal a slew of get-out-of-jail-early credits that in some cases have resulted in murder and attempted murder.
Senator Len Suzio, who for years has been attempting to reform Lawlor’s misnamed Risk Reduction Earned Credits Program, noted recently that Kiwaun Cole had received credits “in 67 of the 72 months he was eligible to receive the credits. This resulted in his discharge on November 29, 2017 rather than his sentence date of May 11, 2020. He never should have been on the streets in the first place.” Upon release, Cole procured a gun and attempted to murder a police officer in Hamden. “It was nothing short of a miracle,” Suzio said, “that the Hamden Police Officer was able to walk away unhurt.”
Victims of Lawlor’s program will not be amused by its Orwellian title. In the first year of its operation, credits were extended retroactively to relevant criminals. They had not “earned” the freebie credits. Suzio has pointed out, “Of the first year group of 8,727 discharges with risk reduction credits, there were 8,351 ‘readmissions’ to prison for various crimes -- 95.69%.” The high rate of recidivism suggests that few risks had been reduced in the early years of the program. (See addenda for additional data below)
Lawlor boasts a varied background. He graduated from the University of Connecticut as an Honors Scholar in Slavic and Eastern European Studies in 1979, an interesting time.
“May you live,’ the ancient Chinese curse has it, “in interesting times.” The Soviet Union, a rancid ideological bubble, had not yet burst, and Premier Leonid Brezhnev had commenced a ten year war against the mujahideen in Afghanistan, often called “the graveyard of empires.” The Soviet Army ultimately was pushed out of Afghanistan by mujahideen groups backed by the United States and Pakistan. The Soviet Union was officially dissolved in 1991, the same year “Maverick” Governor Lowell Weicker imposed an income tax on Connecticut. Students of communism – Lawlor likely was one – will understand that the communist manifesto written by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels recommends “a heavy progressive or graduated income tax,” among other measures, including the centralization of “all instruments of production in the hands of the State,” to assist the proletariat in destroying predatory capitalism.
By 1991, Lawlor had been serving in Connecticut’s General Assembly for four years as a Representative from East Haven. In the course of his career in the state House, where he served as Co-Chairman of the Judiciary Committee along with State Senator Andrew McDonald, Lawlor battled for the abolition of Connecticut’s death penalty. Lawlor supported an abolition bill, later vetoed by Governor Jodi Rell. His fellow anti-death penalty agitator, McDonald, thought at the time that death was a less severe punishment than life in prison. “Death is too kind for some of these defendants,” McDonald said.
|Author Don Pesci|
Connecticut Commentary noted at the time that this excessively sentimental notion was “another bumper-sticker thought that allows an opponent of the death penalty to slather himself with concern for the victims of convicted murderers, any one of whom, unlike McDonald, would rationally prefer life in prison with amenities to death without amenities.”
To read the rest of Don's commentary, visit his web site.
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.