Guest posts are always welcome. Please send submissions for consideration to firstname.lastname@example.org - - - - - We are now supported by advertisers! - - - - - There are NO popup ads. - - - - - Please turn off you ad blocker for this site and check out the ads that catch your interest. Clicking on the wheel opens a new window.
Saturday, February 10, 2018
Red Notes From a Blue State - Lawlor In The Briar Patch
that he was Twitter-in-Chief President Donald Trump, Undersecretary for
Criminal Justice Policy and Planning at the Office of Policy and Management
Michael Lawlor in late January fired off the following tweet: “Wow, Connecticut
gets its first full-force racist enabler candidate for Attorney General.”
According toCTMirror, Lawlor’s target was “Susan Hatfield, a
state prosecutor from eastern Connecticut who was a Donald J. Trump delegate in
2016 and once worked in Washington as a young policy aide to former U.S. House
Speaker Newt Gingrich…” Hatfield, a Republican, is running for the Attorney
General spot soon to be vacated by George Jepsen.
For any number of
reasons, this was not the brightest tweet in Lawlor’s constellation of tweets.
Imputing racism to all Trump delegates smacks of McCarthyism, and Hatfield is a
woman who should be able to toss her hat into a political ring without being peppered
by politicians operating in the #me-too era who ought to be conscious of
possible offenses against women entering the political theatre.
Lawlor instantly was
denounced by State Sen. Heather Somers of Groton, who called him “a hypocrite
for saying he supports more women running for state office and then attacking a
female candidate on social media.” Somers called upon Lawlor to issue a formal
apology. One imagines Lawlor yawning at the prospect of an apology before
conferring on yet another violent convicted criminal a slew of get-out-of-jail-early
credits that in some cases have resulted in murder and attempted murder.
This is not the
first time Lawlor has wandered into a briar patch.
Senator Len Suzio,
who for years has been attempting to reform Lawlor’s misnamed Risk Reduction
Earned Credits Program, noted recently that Kiwaun Colehad received credits “in 67 of the 72 months he was eligible to receive the
credits. This resulted in his discharge on November 29, 2017 rather than his
sentence date of May 11, 2020. He never should have been on the
streets in the first place.” Upon release, Cole procured a gun and attempted to
murder a police officer in Hamden. “It was nothing short of a miracle,” Suzio said, “that
the Hamden Police Officer was able to walk away unhurt.”
Victims of Lawlor’s program will not be amused by its Orwellian title. In
the first year of its operation, credits were extended retroactively to
relevant criminals. They had not “earned” the freebie credits. Suzio has
pointed out, “Of the first year
group of 8,727 discharges with risk reduction credits, there were 8,351 ‘readmissions’
to prison for various crimes -- 95.69%.” The high rate of recidivism suggests
that few risks had been reduced in the early years of the program. (See addenda for additional data below)
Lawlor boasts a
varied background. He graduated from the University of Connecticut as an Honors
Scholar in Slavic and Eastern European Studiesin 1979, an interesting time.
“May you live,’ the ancient Chinese curse has it, “in interesting times.”
The Soviet Union, a rancid ideological bubble, had not yet burst, and Premier
Leonid Brezhnev had commenced a ten year war against the mujahideen in Afghanistan, often called “the
graveyard of empires.” The Soviet Army ultimately was pushed out of Afghanistan by
mujahideen groups backed by the United States and Pakistan. The Soviet Union was
officially dissolved in 1991, the same year “Maverick” Governor Lowell Weicker
imposed an income tax on Connecticut. Students of communism – Lawlor likely was
one – will understand that the communist manifesto written by Karl Marx and
Fredrick Engels recommends “a heavy progressive or graduated income tax,” among
other measures, including the centralization of “all instruments of production
in the hands of the State,” to assist the proletariat in destroying predatory
By 1991, Lawlor had
been serving in Connecticut’s General Assembly for four years as a
Representative from East Haven. In the course of his career in the state House,
where he served as Co-Chairman of the Judiciary Committee along with State
Senator Andrew McDonald, Lawlor battled for the abolition of Connecticut’s
death penalty. Lawlor supported an abolition bill, later vetoed by Governor
Jodi Rell. His fellow anti-death penalty agitator, McDonald, thought at the
time that death was a less severe punishment than life in prison. “Death is too
kind for some of these defendants,” McDonald said.
Author Don Pesci
Connecticut Commentary noted at the time that this excessively
sentimental notion was “another bumper-sticker thought that allows an opponent
of the death penalty to slather himself with concern for the victims of
convicted murderers, any one of whom, unlike McDonald, would rationally prefer
life in prison with amenities to death without amenities.”
To read the rest of Don's commentary, visit his web site.