DHS
May Terminate Border Patrol Union Chief for Reporting Corruption, Blasting
Open Border Policies
JUNE 14, 2017
National Border
Patrol Council President Brandon Judd is under investigation by the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for reporting corruption and
misconduct in agency management, including a disturbing order issued to
officers directing them not to patrol a vulnerable stretch of the northern
border with Canada. Judicial Watch has obtained government documents and
interviewed numerous sources with direct knowledge of the situation, which
appears retaliatory.
The ordeal began in mid-April when Judd,
who heads the union that represents some 16,000 Border Patrol agents
nationwide, denounced a directive to agents to purposely leave a 40-mile
section of the Havre Sector in Montana unsecured. The Havre station covers
approximately 108 miles of international border with Canada and much of it
is sparsely populated. A conservative news outlet obtained a document from
a Havre Sector Border Patrol manager ordering agents to leave 40 miles of
Montana border open and unpatrolled. In an
article,
various Border Patrol agents blamed Obama-era policies and widespread
corruption in the Havre Sector’s upper management. One agent said
criminal cartels exploit border weaknesses daily so they’re certain to
exploit such a large area of open and unpatrolled border.
The
federal officers spoke on the condition that their identity be kept
anonymous, clearly because they feared retaliation. However, Judd, a
veteran Border Patrol agent, went on the record and now DHS is going after
him. In the news story Judd revealed that in recent years the Havre sector
has seen more complaints than any other sector. The union chief also
criticized DHS Secretary John Kelly for endorsing Obama-era open border
policies and condoning his predecessors’ (Janet Napolitano and Jeh
Johnson) failures. Judd also said this in the article: “President Trump
is the president of the common citizen and the choice of the rank-and-file
Border Patrol Agents; unfortunately there are those highly paid career
managers who want to believe they’re above everyone else — up to and
including the President of the United States.”
Secretary
Kelly’s DHS management team responded by launching an investigation into
Judd, accusing him of “unauthorized disclosure of law enforcement
information” in the news story referenced above. In a letter to the DHS
Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Border Patrol Council’s legal
division writes that nothing in the article qualified as law enforcement
sensitive information, though such disclosures are protected by the
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) as well as the Whistleblower Protection
Enhancement Act (WPEA). The article did not specify the exact location of
the 40 miles, whether the 40 miles was contiguous or even the Border Patrol
station within the Havre Sector where the order was given, the letter
states. “Based upon the law, DHS/OIG cannot legally sustain any
allegation that Mr. Judd improperly disclosed law enforcement
information,” the
letter
says. “Also, we understand that DHS/OIG is only the investigatory body
responsible for gathering the facts and that any threatened or actual
personnel action would be taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. As a
result, we are forwarding this memorandum to CBP as well as the Office of
Special Counsel (OSC) to ensure that no threatened or actual personnel
action be taken against Mr. Judd.”
Originally, the agency
watchdog launched a probe into allegations of corruption divulged by Judd
in an electronic mail to Border Patrol Chief Ronald Vitiello and Associate
Chief Rodolfo Karisch. In the email, titled “Allegation of Corruption,”
Judd cited evidence he believed showed that an operations change at the
Havre Sector was “due to either corruption, retaliation, or for political
purposes.” Judd expressed concern for the safety of agents as well as the
public and the DHS OIG launched a criminal investigation into Havre Sector
management officials. At some point in the corruption probe of Havre Sector
management, the watchdog initiated an administrative investigation into
Judd for reasons that aren’t clear. Judicial Watch reached out to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, the 60,000-employee agency that encompasses
the Border Patrol, but calls went unanswered. The administration’s
official reason for going after Judd is the “unauthorized disclosure of
law enforcement information.” In a
document
obtained by Judicial Watch, the DHS OIG warns Judd that he may be subject
to disciplinary action that includes termination.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.