Guest posts are always welcome. Please send submissions for consideration to email@example.com - - - - - We are now supported by advertisers! - - - - - There are NO popup ads. - - - - - Please turn off you ad blocker for this site and check out the ads that catch your interest. Clicking on the wheel opens a new window.
Saturday, February 25, 2017
'Progressives' Fantasizing about Civil War like Children Playing with Fire
Have those cavalierly proposing such scenarios as the appropriate response to
Donald Trump considered all the likely factors?
by David Codrea
"Chicago 'scholar' claims militias would be 'toast' if resisting military coup," I posted last
month. A "progressive journalist" was enamored of a "progressive
academic," both presuming the military is as predominantly subversive as
they are. It would not only help them depose President Trump, the
delusion goes, but would do all their dirty work for them.
as for the fate of us "bitter clingers" and "deplorables"? They did
their best to convince their echo chamber we'd be made short and
effortless work of.
This presupposes those who support
and defend the Constitution are the enemy. And the whole fantasy seems
painfully unaware of the myriad factors that would rise to the surface
and compete for dominance once disincentives against them were
weakened or removed.
"I stumbled across this 9 minute blog cast from 2016, I think it's dead-bang on," "Enemies" trilogy
author and former SEAL team member Matt Bracken advised in an email
linking to "Former Red Team Planner For The Federal Government Talks
about Civil War Scenarios."
endorsement means a lot in terms of credibility. Simply put, he's more
qualified to offer such an assessment than many, certainly more so than
the eggheads calling for toast.
While no one has a crystal
ball, the video Matt shared offers as possible an array of
potentialities as any, and is consistent with much of the speculation
we've discussed over the years in terms of foreign enemy opportunism,
infrastructure vulnerability, what fractured military and government
departments/agencies are likely to be doing (especially when factoring
in Oath Keepers and other loyal Americans who would not obey treasonous
orders), and what roles an armed citizenry might play. Let's take a few
moments and watch it [Warning: there is some occasional off-color/NSFW language peppered throughout]:
What do you think? Do you disagree with any of this? Is there anything you'd add?
How much thought have you put into such possibilities? And how much preparation?
than coup-thirsty "progressives," who are all for a military
dictatorship providing they are in no way inconvenienced and emerge
after the smoke clears, take over the reins of power, and rule like the
Philosopher Kings they presume themselves to be?
To read more, or make a comment on this post, GO HERE
you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution
against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a
donation to support our work. You can donate HERE.