On Monday, 25 citizens convinced the Common Council that despite scientific evidence supporting the contrary & a report by an outside engineering consultant Milone & McBroom explaining cost savings & benefits, artificial turf is dangerous to peoples health. The $37 million bond referendum now reads that no artificial can be used on city fields. Currently, the high school has a synthetic football field. Soccer coaches at the meeting argued a lengthened playing season as an advantage of synthetic over natural grass. Councilwoman Mary Bartolotta (D) lead the charge to strip the synthetic turf language from the ordinance & Mayor Drew cast the tie breaking vote. Absent were councilmembers Sandra Russo- Driska and Carl Chisem. A medical doctor from the audience testified to synthetic turf being safe. Jonah Center founder John Hall, Conservation Commisdion members, Superintendent Pat Charles and BOE member Ed McKeon spoke of supposed "known" health hazards of synthetic turf but failed to provide evidence.
The City Council was considering installing synthetic turf at 9 of the city owned playing fields as part of $37 million referendum package including parks improvements to be voted on this fall by citizens. The bond amount without synthetic turf as an option amounts to $10 million, however, the council failed to reduced the ordinance before passing it on to the public for a referendum vote. As it stands, the entire amount will be borrowed & goes to citizens to vote on in November.
Prior to the meeting, a letter from a newly formed local activist group (?) ECoin - made of up what seem to be wannabe scientists branched off from the Jonah Center - Rev. John Hall - I want wife killer David Messenger freed to worship- for Earth Air Art & Green$$ Folkers - which can be read over at the Eye's website outlining the "danger" to children and "potential cancer risk" confirmed not by a scientific study, but MSNBC and a soccer goalie who swears on Al Gore's hair piece that synthetic turf causes cancer in children.
We would like to issue this PSA Disclaimer before reading the letter:
1. We get a lot of sh*t for siging as a collective Middletown Insider and not our God given names- this letter is signed ECoin group; "Treefanatic." Treefanatic is resident arborist Jane Harrris indicated on past posts, just sayin'! Other "experts" in this ECoin group? Just regular lay people not scientists. Guess it's OK when you're of a particular political persuasion...
2. The article cited is by MSNBC which cites a Yale study & an EPA study which concluded that synthetic turf was found NOT to be harmful as far as causing cancer. The article states that both studies were NOT inconclusive, but they were conslusive. If further study was done, which they both suggested maybe a link might be found. Who knows. The author of the Ecoin letter says almost definitively that the studies were inconclusive. The original article Ecoin's letter improperly cites can be read here: Read it for yourself and don't rely on anyone's - especially this groups sour regurgitation.
A 2010 study by CT DEP determined no added risks. In fact, the Board of Heath for Mass, NY &; California all came to the same conclusion. The City of Boston just voted down this spring a proposed moratorium on the use of synthetic turf at its city's fields due to lack of evidence of risks. Click below to enlarge concise letter outlining these studies. In January 2015, the CT Dept. Of Public Health reissued a letter discouraging the circulation of false claims about synthetic fields. Prior in 2008, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal suggested prosecution for those perpetuating claims.
The ECoin article cites non profit research that just happens to have been performed by lobbyist for organic field companies, which just happen to compete with the synthetic guys, conflict much?
3. The letter is written with decisive language purposely meant to be alarming to readers and misleading, look at the title "
"Artificial Turf Fields—A Costly, Risky Solution to Improving the City’s Playing Fields"
We would argue that organic grass fields are the safest option, and we should PLAY IT SAFE.
Just an FYI, I think that I read in the paper that Messenger has been approved to live full time in Hartford now. He had been on a program where he returned to CVH on weekends. I think that the article stated that his ability to travel from Hartford is supposed to be limited.ReplyDelete
Good grief! Thanks for the update!ReplyDelete
Do your own research, it's not that hard! Read the data and conclusions to get informed. Copy and paste the below websites and studies, to read them.ReplyDelete
Don't forget that some of Middletown's athletic fields are on old landfills and to this day continue to settle. That's why we continually renovated them throughout the year. Their water tables are only a few feet below grade.
Palmer Field, Hubbard Little League, and Pat Kidney Field are old landfills. When we did any excavation in the past at these sites, we pulled out old lumber, auto parts, and other construction and non-degradable materials. All three of these sites have tributaries they run off to directly next to them.
The children of middletown are no doubt precious and should be protected from any harm from artificial turf even if there is any doubt or question of a health or safety concern.ReplyDelete
The nfl and its players are a giant corporation.
Would these corporations let their most valuable assets be even slightly harmed or exposed to toxins if these allegations are even remotely true?
Shame on those that prey on fear on behalf of being environmentally conscious.
And by the way all you enviro, nimby folks here in this fine city.... Those fieds are made primarily of 100% recycled materials in which you all advocate so passionately for.
Excellent links John Milardo! Thank you! Maintenance & performance are the real questions that should be asked prior to purchase instead of fear mongering.ReplyDelete
It's the adult leagues that need the increased field hoursReplyDelete
The youth sports organizations of middletown were told this was a "slam dunk". The mayor was behind it. We went to several meetings where the council was behind it. We were told that the director would keep us in the loop as far as public comment meetings were concerned.ReplyDelete
We got calls the afternoon of the special meeting (much shorter notice than previous) to tell us about it.
With many sports now in the midst of fall practices, and the confidence exuded by the powers that be, there was a low turn out from the youth sports leagues and the thousands of parent/voters that make up our memberships. I hope Mr. Serra gets his revote, we will be there.
I personally will not vote to approve 37 million with out the artificial turf. I need to know:
a) What exactly are we doing to the parks.
b) The cost.
The artificial turf was a HUGE part of that 37 million.
Join the movement, make yourself heard.
Vote, please. Thanks very muchReplyDelete