Dear Friends,
It's less than three weeks to go until Election Day and my opponent is
clearly desperate and attempting to mislead voters. Please help me push
back and set the record straight. Share this message with as many
voters as you can.
Reason #1 to support Rep. Sampson for State Senate over his opponent – He doesn’t lie on his campaign mailers.
Last week, it was a false statement in a campaign mailer about my record on prescription drugs and healthcare.
Today, another campaign mailer from my opponent showed up in mailboxes across the district.
Below, I will address ALL FIVE false statements from my opponent’s mailer one by one.
1 - “Voted NO to pay equity – one of 4 no votes”
My
opponent is attempting to deceive voters into believing that I voted
against equal pay for women. However, the bill has absolutely nothing to
do with pay equity for women, or anyone else. The language simply adds
even more regulation on businesses - preventing employers from inquiring
of job applicants of any gender, about their pay history.
2 - “Voted NO to health benefits for women and children”
Here,
my opponent is attempting to deceive voters into believing that I voted
against health benefits for women and children. That is an absurd
accusation on its face but let me address it. This bill included 2 basic
parts. First, it was a Democratic initiative that places major parts of
OBAMACARE into CT law out of fear that the Trump administration and
congress may succeed in repealing it. This would preserve Obamacare in
CT state law. Since this bad policy which has done extensive damage to
both the access and affordability of healthcare is still federal law,
the bill has no current effect.
Second,
it would radically expand the state mandated coverages for
contraception. As someone who believes women should have the right to
make their own decisions about their own bodies – and that they should
make the choices about their healthcare rather than bunch of
politicians, I offered an amendment to require that all insurance
companies must offer these products as an option to their customers, and
let them decide if they want to pay the additional premium for these
things or not. My amendment was defeated on a party line vote – with
every Democrat legislator voting against a women’s choice to make her
own healthcare decisions.
3 – “Voted NO to protections for domestic violence victims”
Here,
my opponent claims that I would eliminate protections for female
victims of domestic violence. Yet another absurd claim. That is akin to
saying someone is against clean water, or quality education, etc. Is
there anyone out there foolish enough to believe that? This is a
somewhat complex piece of legislation that had only one aim in mind, and
it was not to protect women from domestic violence. It was to use
identity politics to further a radical gun control agenda and to deny
the constitutional protection of due process to gun owners. The sad part
of this bill is that its passage has actually made women less safe.
Now, a woman who is a legitimate victim of domestic violence can have
her right to self-protection taken away based on the simple accusation
of her abuser. Many women testified AGAINST this bill and rightfully so.
4 – “Supports criminalizing a woman’s right to choose – even in cases of rape, incest, and serious risk to the mother”
She provided no citation here.
This
is the most egregious lie on the piece. I have never proposed any
legislation to curtail abortion rights in any way. I have also never
advocated for overturning Roe v. Wade. When asked about this, I have
always openly and honestly stated my position which is that I am
personally pro-life, but I am also a libertarian who believes the
government has no right in personal decisions.
My record is clear. I have fought for personal choice in healthcare since day one and I stand by my record.
I
have only ever advocated for two policies concerning abortion - 1)
parental notification - because it catches abusers and rapists, and 2)
elimination of third trimester abortions - because I believe that is
simply just going too far.
These are very mainstream policies that we should have. Those that oppose them are the ones out of touch.
5 – Supports eroding women’s reproductive rights”
Here,
my opponent is attempting to deceive voters into believing that I want
to restriction reproductive rights. That is false. The bill simply
requires that parents of a minor girl who intends to have an abortion
must be notified in advance of the procedure. It does not require the
parent's consent - only notification. The whole purpose of a parental
notification law is to catch rapists and abusers, so they cannot hide
their crimes. Imagine a 12-year-old girl being raped by a babysitter or
an uncle and being forced by the perpetrator to go have an abortion.
This can happen in Connecticut currently without the parents ever
knowing their child had an abortion let alone was the victim of such a
crime. I am extremely sympathetic to circumstances that might be
uncomfortable when it comes to teen pregnancies and have made that clear
each time I have proposed legislation. It must absolutely make
exceptions and provide for a judicial bypass procedure.
With
regard to rights and access, I personally find it difficult to
juxtapose laws in our society that would allow a 14 year old young woman
to terminate a pregnancy without her parent's knowledge when we have
other laws that prohibit minors from getting their ears pierced, or to
get a tattoo, or to buy a pack of cigarettes, and so on.
____________________________________________________
I
have chosen to focus on my own record in my campaign. Certainly, it is
ok for candidates to point out differences from their opponents.
However, it is NOT ok to distort their records.
My
opponent has a record also. I promise that if I refer to it in my
campaign materials, I will in no way attempt to distort her record or
mislead voters.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.