Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Red Notes From a Blue State - The Trump Opposition In Connecticut

There are two stories in the Hartford Courant of general interest. The first is a front page, top of the fold story, “Getting To Know Joe Ganim” the present Democrat Mayor of Bridgeport now running for governor.

The story is what we call in the trade “a puff piece.” Perhaps all we need to know about Ganim is that he’s not John Rowland, though the recent past of both are eerily similar. Would a major newspaper in Connecticut publish a top of the fold, front page puff piece on Rowland if, after his release from prison, he had run for, say, mayor of Hartford, won, and then announced his candidacy for governor, as Ganim did in Bridgeport? Unfortunately for the hapless Rowland, he went into the radio talk show business on his first release from the hoosegow.
The second front page, top of the fold story, parked next to the Ganim story, is “Gun Control Hopes Rise,” reprinted from the Washington Post. Here is the lead: “The school shooting in Parkland, Florida has sparked an urgent push for gun control, giving activists cautious hope that politicians might be willing to take some type of bipartisan action – action that has been illusive after previous mass shootings... President Donald Trump said Monday that he is open to improving the background check system used to screen those who buy firearms, a measure that has bipartisan support and the backing of the National Rifle Association (NRA).”

The shocking note in the story is that Trump and the NRA, vilified shamelessly in Connecticut by the state’s all Democrat U.S. Congressional Delegation and a colluding media – U.S. Senators Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy taking the lead – have voiced support for the FixNICS Act, a Murphy-John Cornyn bill. Murphy offered a gloss on all this: “Trump’s support for the FixNICS Act, my bill with @John Cornyn, is another sign the politics of gun violence are shifting rapidly.” The paper noted that Murphy added a proviso: “the bill alone is not an adequate response to mass shootings.”

How should we characterize “the politics of gun violence?”

The data on gun violence have been manipulated by Murphy and others, whose rhetoric is maddeningly misleading. “First get your facts, then you can distort them at your leisure," Mark Twain said. I’ve written about this most recently here.

The “recent development” reported in the story – hinting that Trump has had a Damascus Road conversion on the matter of gun regulation – is what Twain used to call “a stretcher.” But it should serve as a speed bump for highly partisan opponents of Trump, including all the Democrat members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation, but most especially rhetorical flame-throwers Blumenthal and Murphy. Both, for example, have suggested Trump is batty or senile or malevolent. Trump, and anyone associated with him, however remote the association, have “blood on their hands.” And the caveat in the story, suggesting further unalterable opposition, indicates that Murphy in the future plans to take that speed bump at ninety miles an hour: “The bill alone is not an adequate response to mass shootings.” Approval of the bill allows Murphy to have his cake and eat it too.

And what does that mean?

It means that Murphy and others do not want Trump’s presumed
Author Don Pesci
Damascus Road conversion to kill a promising campaign bludgeon. The same stratagem shows itself in the highly attenuated Trump-Russian collusion stories. According to the law, one may be innocent until proven guilty, but process justice can delay an accounting of innocence or guilt as long as the means of delay are available. . . .

To read the rest of Don's commentary, visit his web site.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.

Popular Posts