by David Codrea
Feuer
and Beck aren't "anti-gun per se. As long as they control them, they
like all kinds of guns just fine. (Mike Feuer/Facebook)
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
by David Codrea
"Arizona gun laws in L.A.? It could happen," an editorial in The Los Angeles Times penned by L.A. City Attorney Mike Feuer and LAPD Chief Charlie Beck warns.
"Two
bills stacked with legislative sponsors - HB 38 in the House, SB 446
in the Senate - would override our state's longstanding rules governing
who is allowed to carry a concealed, loaded firearm in public," Feuer
and Beck explain. "These bills, both called the Concealed Carry
Reciprocity Act, would dictate that if a person can carry a concealed
weapon in any state, that person could carry it everywhere in America.
This should be a call to action for all Californians concerned about
keeping their families safe."
And why would that be?
"In
addition to jeopardizing public safety, concealed carry reciprocity
would endanger the lives of law enforcement," they lie. "The mere
presence of more concealed weapons on California streets would make
police work here much more hazardous."
Yes, I wrote
"lie." First by employing the loaded term "dictate," as if
their "right" to usurp powers is being infringed. And that "blood in
the streets/Dodge City over fender benders" hysteria has been used by
the gun-grabbers every time a state has considered adopting "shall
issue" permitting laws. It not only doesn't come true, leading honest
LEOs to admit they were wrong for opposing it, it also increases the sampling size to where objectively, another inconvenient truth becomes apparent.
Per economist and author John Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center:
"Permits have been revoked for firearms-related violations at rates of thousandths of one percentage point. Civilian permit holders are less likely than police officers to be convicted of a firearms violation."
Motes and beams, Charlie...
In
true Opposite Day fashion, Feuer's and Beck's "progressive" stance is
actually one desperately clinging to the past to maintain L.A.s "may
issue" permit system. That generally means "may not" as far as
commoners are concerned, ensuring the only non-law enforcement citizens
allowed to "legally" carry are well-connected political elites and celebrities.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.