Image from My World Encyclopedia |
In
Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the
hands of their teachers at the beginning and end of the school day.
It's a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher and
pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom
atmosphere.
Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life.
Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life.
And
the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the handshake is
that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who have lived in
Switzerland for several years (and thus are familiar with its
mores), in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to shake the
hands of their teacher, a woman, because, they claimed, this would
violate Muslim teachings that contact with the opposite sex is
allowed only with family members.
At
first the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially
granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of any
female teacher. But an uproar followed, as Mayor Reto Wolf explained
to the BBC: "the community was unhappy with the decision taken by
the school. In our culture and in our way of communication a
handshake is normal and sends out respect for the other person, and
this has to be brought home to the children in school."
Therwil's Educational Department reversed
the school's decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the
school's exemption was lifted because "the public interest with
respect to equality between men and women and the integration of
foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion." It
added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake.
Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again "the
sanctions called for by law will be applied," which included a
possible fine of up to 5,000 dollars.
This
uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at the
original exemption granted to the Muslim boys, did not end after
that exemption was itself overturned by the local Educational
Department. The Swiss understood quite clearly that this was more
than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a fight over whether
the Swiss would be masters in their own house, or whether they would
be forced to yield, by the granting of special treatment, to the
Islamic view of the proper relations between the sexes. It is one
battle – small but to the Swiss significant – between overweening
Muslim immigrants and the indigenous
Swiss.
Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn,
all hell broke loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic
Central Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the
Swiss decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticized the
ruling in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the
handshaking is "totalitarian" (!) because its intent is to "forbid
religious people from meeting their obligations to God."
That, of course, was never the "intent" of
the long-standing handshaking custom, which was a nearly-universal
custom in Switzerland, and in schools had to do only with
encouraging the right classroom atmosphere of mutual respect between
instructor and pupil, of which the handshake was one aspect.
The
Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing claims — will
be familiar to Americans versed in Constitutional adjudication. In
this case "the public interest with respect to equality" of the
sexes and the "integration of foreigners" (who are expected to adopt
Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt them from some of those
ways) were weighed against the "religious obligations to God" of
Muslims, and the former interests found to outweigh the latter.
What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.
What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.
The
handshake has been upheld and, what's more, a stiff fine now will be
imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake hands with a female
teacher. This is a heartening sign of non-surrender by the Swiss.
But the challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and
customs of the indigenes have no logical end and will not stop.
And
the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the
stronger and more frequent their challenges will be. They are
attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a
second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of
numbers from both migration and by outbreeding the Infidels, to
fashion not a parallel society but one society — now dominated by
Muslim sharia.
The
Swiss handshaking dispute has received some, but not enough, press
attention. Presumably, it's deemed too inconsequential a matter to
bother with. But the Swiss know better. And so should we.
There's an old Scottish saying that in one
variant reads: "Many a little makes a mickle." That is, the
accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That's
what's happening in Europe today. This was one victory for the side
of sanity. There will need to be a great many more.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.