‘Common Basis for What’s True’
 |
| Photo courtesy of Politico |
In this
article from MRCTV, Bannister reports Obama as having said; "We don’t
have a common basis for what’s true and what’s not." This is frightening:
for will be entrusted to determine the truth?
What is it that will make those so appointed more qualified that you and me to determine the truth, when able to weigh both sides of a matter?
But, Obama complains; "we can choose our own facts", based on "the most sensational conflict and the most incendiary sound bites."
What is it that will make those so appointed more qualified that you and me to determine the truth, when able to weigh both sides of a matter?
But, Obama complains; "we can choose our own facts", based on "the most sensational conflict and the most incendiary sound bites."
Is this not a declaration of war on free speech and
open debate? Is this not Orwellian in nature? How can this not be
interpreted as a
desire to control what the Public hears; to taking
control of, and determining what is, the "legitimate" press; and
"truth"?
Will this effectively spell the end to small, on-line
alternative news sources such as The Middletown Insider; or, The Blaze; or, The
Huff Po; or, Alex Jones?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.