At tonight's Special Common Council meeting the budget for the City for fiscal year 2013-2014 was passed which increases the mill rate from 26.9 mills to 27.7 mills. The final budget approved was reduction of 0.1 mills from the Mayor's proposed budget and was approved by a vote of 6 to 5. The nay votes came from the four Republican Council members (Philip Pessina, Joseph Bibisi, Deborah Kleckowski, Linda Salafia) and Democrat Todd Berch. The approved budget changes from the Mayor's budget were submitted by most of the Democratic caucus with the exception of Councilwoman Mary Bartolotta and Councilman Todd Berch. Councilman Grady Faulkner was a signatory of the amendment but was absent from the meeting.

Guest posts are always welcome. Please send submissions for consideration to middletowninsider@gmail.com - - - - - We are now supported by advertisers! - - - - - There are NO popup ads. - - - - - Please turn off you ad blocker for this site and check out the ads that catch your interest. Clicking on the wheel opens a new window.
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Run Down on Middletown's Common Council Budget Vote
At tonight's Special Common Council meeting the budget for the City for fiscal year 2013-2014 was passed which increases the mill rate from 26.9 mills to 27.7 mills. The final budget approved was reduction of 0.1 mills from the Mayor's proposed budget and was approved by a vote of 6 to 5. The nay votes came from the four Republican Council members (Philip Pessina, Joseph Bibisi, Deborah Kleckowski, Linda Salafia) and Democrat Todd Berch. The approved budget changes from the Mayor's budget were submitted by most of the Democratic caucus with the exception of Councilwoman Mary Bartolotta and Councilman Todd Berch. Councilman Grady Faulkner was a signatory of the amendment but was absent from the meeting.
15 comments:
Authors of comments and posts are solely responsible for their statements. Please email MiddletownInsider@gmail.com for questions or concerns. This blog, (and any site using the blogger platform), does not and cannot track the source of comments. While opinions and criticism are fine, they are subject to moderator discretion; slander and vile attacks of individuals will not to be tolerated. Middletown Insider retains the right to deny any post or comment without explanation.
Popular Posts
-
This post first appeared on January 3. On January 24, it was reverted to a draft and rescheduled to post at 9:30 on the morning of the...
-
Steven DeToro Article and photos by Brian E. Clark, staff writer André Breton cited a profound quote regarding suicide, say...
-
Ben Florsheim, Public Figure You are within your rights to make wild, baseless accusations and live your life in an alternative reality...
-
Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. 2A Tuesdays It is critical that as many members (and other Second Amendment supporters)...
-
http://www.hipwiki.com/RIP-Rest+In+Peace Last week I made a post, " I Have Enemies ", in which I named my neighbors, Marcus Ke...
Do you ever feel like you're try to get upstream without a paddle? It seems as though Middletown voters are okay with how their government operates, and how and why their taxes are increasing. Everyone is mum about everything going on in town. Voters either agree with it, and believe all the BS, or they've just given up? I hope it's neither!
ReplyDeleteor residents just don"t care anymore since things have been the same for two decades.
ReplyDeleteIt is very frustrating. I try to explain to my neighbors but they just don't get it. Blindly vote for the party that is screwing them. 75% of the people I know are laid off and this doofus gets a raise. And what about transparency? BS
ReplyDeleteTo John Milardo
ReplyDeleteYou critize all the time. Please list what cuts you would make to the Budget and why? That way we can see what you are talking about. aAnyone can be a Monday morning Quaterback ,so I'll look foward to seeing your cuts.
Is it BOE? Water? Parks? Public Works? Police? your floor
I can understand John's frustration with the budget and I think he's entitled to be a Monday morning quarterback - more than most of us. He's got over thirty years of service with the city and much of that as the person responsible for the Parks budget; he's also be an officer in his union for years. Several years ago, he was instrumental in getting the various union together and formulated a plan that would have reduced expenditures by a million dollars. However, the Council, many who are still on today's Council, rejected the plan. So I can see why he's frustrated and so am I.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteWe don't want a John Milardo cheerleader. Just want to lnow what John would cut. He seems to be very P.O ed at Budget, so give us your cuts John.
To the last Anonymous.
ReplyDeleteI just read your comments. I don't have a copy of 2013 expenditures, but it probably isn't much different than what happens every year. You basically have the same political minds putting the budget together. Certain departments are taken care of, while others are left to scrape by. The millions of dollars of concessions and cost saving suggestions that were offered by the Unions years ago would still fly today.
Just off the top of my head, I can come up with at least eight to ten positions within the City, that local politicians created for certain political or family members.
Have someone in the Finance Dept give you a cost breakdown of yearly appropriations, and your head will spin. Remember, an appropriation is equivalent to using a charge card without having any money in your bank. Appropriations come from the city fund balance. (the rainy day fund)
You want to save money? Why is the City putting so much money into soccer fields which are privately owned? Riddle me this Batman; If a privately owned organization can get public funds for sodding a field, they why can't a general taxpayer ask for the same perk? Why are youth baseball leagues allowed to invite out of town teams to play on "their" fields - which the city owns and maintains - just so they can bolster sales at their concession stand.
How is it now acceptable for the Democrats in power to raid the employee funded pension fund to pay for medical benefits? When a Republican mayoral candidate suggested it years ago, these same Democrats declared it was corrupt and illegal.
Anonymous, your dearly beloved Democrats will be safe for another couple of years, so don't fret. You'll still be able to kiss some good ole "jackass" butt to get what you want.
Why not post that the Middletown Fire Dept. has increased its tax to 6.1 mils?
ReplyDeleteTo anonymous 11:51 pm: No reason why we did not post. We are working on a breakdown of all the fire district budget rates; we previously published numbers from South Fire and Wethersfield and will compile a comparison soon. Thank you for the reminder. Please send us any info you have we are happy for input.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteMr. Milardo
Great answer.but as you cal your self a union person please list the 8 to 10 jobs you would cut out of the Budget.
As a union person and tax payer the union is there to protect workers, but not protect them from themselves. Excess in government spending union positions or not should considered in the budget process when looking for places to cut. Most positions that are excessive, and unnecessary are non-union, but not all- and it is no reflection on the people holding those jobs but the jobs themselves. You sound like you have a personal issue with Mr. Milardo and a clear ax to grind asking him to name names. You had your chance at the polls to elect responsible people to council and the mayors office- instead you chose the same clowns and are getting the same funny business. The government should not be in the business of job creation to keep people's cronies employed, but the business of government and providing necessary services and infrastructure.
ReplyDeleteIf a private company raided its employee's pension fund that CEO would be in prison! If a mayor does it to reduce shortfalls in the budget it is NOT ok! That is not public money like the general fund! Good job John for pointing this out- if citizens only knew!
ReplyDeleteTo Anonymous 12:05.
ReplyDeleteI will not name names, but everyone who has any knowledge of City workings, know the answers.
Unions are not in the business to create jobs, they are in the business to keep jobs which are created by an employer and represent those employees when needed, so they have a voice in aspects of their job.
If I were you Anonymous, I would want to know who the Councilperson(s) are who take care of their friends and families on your dime, and wield such power? Maybe it is time for term limits, even at the municipal level.
Just as a point of information, several of the major managerial positions are non-Union jobs, and GIVEN, not earned, to friends and family members, even though they were not qualified. Major qualifications for their jobs were dummy downed for these individuals, by no other than your Democratic Council.
John you do not have to say names to know you are talking about the PD. That was all over the news and mentioned by Earl the Pearl during the council meeting. Don't fret, the problem with right itself. When someone does not pose the right skill set for a job, eventually they will do themselves in. just look at what's happened over the years at the PD. Brymer GONE...LYNN....2 years....GONE....MCMOUTH....2 YEARS....GONE.....The recent Lt. Demoted to OFFICER......Time stands still for know one. crazy stuff....from the outside or the inside.
ReplyDeleteTo anonymous, at 1:21... Right on the money....don't forget honor, integrity,morals, good clean reputations and excellence. Super fiends alive and well with an all new rebirth!
ReplyDelete